EFL Teachers' Perceptions of Learner Autonomy: Does STD-Based Training Make a Difference in their Autonomy-Supportive Behaviors?

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. in TEFL, Department of English Language, Research and Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of English Language, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research branch, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Imam Ali University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Learner autonomy as both an individual as well as a social concept is considered to be a vital element in language learning. Moreover, enhancing learner autonomy has been a main concern among language learning scholars. Because of this primacy, this study in two phases, first sought to examine the desirability and feasibility of learner autonomy from teachers' perspective, and then sought to study the effectiveness of training on enhancing teachers' autonomy-supportive behaviors. Seventy-two Iranian EFL teachers' views were collected via an autonomy questionnaire developed by Borg and Al-Busaidi (2012). The results indicated that the teachers conceived autonomy to be more desirable than feasible. They considered autonomy as an ideal optional rather than an accessible purpose. Furthermore, classroom observations indicated that training in workshops that were based on self-determination theory (SDT) enhanced teachers' autonomy-supportive behaviors. Trained teachers outperformed untrained teachers in almost all criteria in the ASBI checklist. The study has implications for EFL teachers and teacher educators. The contribution SDT can have on autonomy enhancement indicates its significance and potential to be accentuated in instructional programs as well as pre-service and in-service training sessions.

Keywords

Main Subjects


References
Baecque, A., & Toubiana, S. (2000). Truffaut. University of California Press.
Bradbury, R. (1953). Fahrenheit 451. New York. Ballantine books.
Bluestone, G. (1957). Novels into film. University of California Press.
Buzereau, L. (2003). Fahrenheit 451, the novel: A discussion with author Ray Bradbury. University
of California Press.
Corrigan, T. (2007). Literature on screen: a history in the gap. Oxford University Press.
Cahir, L. C. (2006). Literature into film: Theory and practical approaches. Jefferson, NC:
McFarland.
Casetti, F. (2008). Adaptation and mis-adaptation. In R. Stam & A. Raengo (Eds.), A companion to
literature and film. Blackwell.
Friedman, S. S. (2004). Whose modernity? The global landscape of modernism. Humanities Institute
Lecture, University of Texas at Austin.
Hutcheon, L. (2012). A theory of adaptation. New York. Routledge.
Holasut, M. (2014). “Objectifying the Fetish: Revisiting François Truffaut’s Adaptation of
Fahrenheit 451, Journal of Liberal Arts, 14(2), 33-49.
Hamon, P. (1977). “Texte littéraire et métalangage”. Poétique. Revue de Théorie et d'Analyse
Littéraires Paris, (31), 261-284.
Henderson, O. (2018). Fahrenheit 451. RogerEbert.com.
Marciniak, M. (2007). “The appeal of literature-to-film adaptations”. Lingua ac Communitas, 17(1),
59–67.
Mazzocco, J. (2018). Fahrenheit 451 in 2018: Can film bring Ray Bradbury's classic into the modern
age? Yale National Initiative.
Nichols, P. (2013). Classics cut to fit? Fahrenheit 451 and its appeal in other media. In L. Bloom
(Ed.), Critical insights: Fahrenheit 451 (pp. 92–106). Salem Press.
Plášilová, A. (2015). Comparison of the film and book Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury
. [Unpublished Thesis, Charles University in Prague]
Repository.
Samuels, T. (1972). Encountering directors. Putnam.
Smith, M. (2022). Engaging characters: Fiction, emotion, and the cinema. Oxford University Press.
Truffaut, F. (1966). “Journal of “Fahrenheit 451”. Cahiers du cinéma, 180, 18.
Whalen, T. (2007). The Consequences of Passivity: Re-Evaluating “Truffaut's Fahrenheit 451”.
Literature/Film Quarterly, 35(3), 181-190.
Zipes, J. (2008). “Mass degradation of humanity and massive contradictions in Bradbury’s vision of
America in Fahrenheit 451”. In H. Bloom (Ed.), Bloom’s Modern Critical Interpretations:
Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451. Bloom’s Literary Criticism/ Infobase Publishing. 3-18.