Semantics of Persian Light Verbs

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Degree in Linguistics, Faculty of Foreign languages, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 Department of English language, Faculty of Human Sciences, Islamic Azad University of Garmsar, Garmsar, Iran

Abstract

Much research has been done on semantics of the verbal element of complex predicates (CPr), usually referred to as light verb (LV). Most researchers have confined their studies to a few limited features of light verbs. After criticizing major views proposed by scholars on the semantics of light verbs, this article presents a hypothesis on the formation of complex predicates, arguing that all of which directly or indirectly have roots in incorporation process. This process starts with a complete sentence, incorporating two elements into it and ends in eliminating other elements. Formation of each complex predicate leads to the formation of the constructional schema X+LV0 which sanctions formation of new complex predicates with the same light verb and in the same semantic field. Accordingly, the meaning of light verb in direct incorporation case is the same meaning as its heavy verb, and in indirect incorporation case is dissolved in constructional meaning of the sanctioning schema. The meaning of light verb in each of these two cases could be different and each of them is taken or similar to one of its heavy meanings. There is a third case in which the light verb plays the role of verbalizing element and makes possible for a nonverbal predicate to inflect as a verb. Thus light verbs vary from having completely schematic and non-thematic meanings to their own primary heavy meanings.

Keywords

References

References
Dabir-Moghaddam, M. (1997). “Compound Verbs in Persian”. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 27(2), 25–59.
Karimi-Doostan, G. (1997). Light verb Constructions in Persian. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Essex.
Sadeghi, A. A. (1993). Darbare-ye fe‘l-ha-ye ja‘li dar zaban-e farsi [On denominal verbs in persian], In Proceedings of the Seminar of Persian and the Language of Science, 236-246.
Shaghaghi, V. (2008). “Incorporation in Persian”. Grammar, 3, 3-39.
Tabataba‘i, A. A. D. (2004). “Hazf-e hamkard dar vaje-ha-ye morakkab-e fe‘li [Nominal compounds derived from compound verbs]”. Grammar, 1(1), 59-63.
Vahedi-Langrudi, Mohammad-Mehdi. (1996). The Syntax, Semantics and Argument Structure of Complex Predicates in Modern Farsi. PhD Dissertation, University of Ottawa.
 Vahedi-langrudi, M. M. (2000). Barrasi va Moghayese-ye Barkhi Farayandha-ye Vaje-Sazi Dar Hoze-ye Vajegan-e Farsi [A Comparative Study of Some Word-Formation Processes in Persian Lexicon], Proceeding of the first Seminar of Word-Selecting and Teminology Issues, Iranian Academy of Persian Language and Literature, 95-136.
Partee, B. & Mats Rooth (1982). “Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity”. To appear in von Stechow, Arnim et al., (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation, de Gruyter.
Szabolcsi, A. (1984). “From The Definiteness Effect to Lexical Integrity”. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik, 24: 178-218.
Linguistic Studies: Theory and Practice
Volume 1, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
Fall and Winter 2023
March 2023
Pages 191-206

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 01 February 2023
  • Revise Date: 22 February 2023
  • Accept Date: 11 March 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics