The confrontation between conflicting elements and the people in the story of Kaveh and ‎Zahhak, based on the theory of critical discourse analysis by Laclau and Mouffe.‎

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. in Persian language and literature - Payame Noor - Tehran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

One of the striking confrontations in the Shahnameh that occurs through a dialogue between a ‎hostile government and the people’s force is the opposition between Zahak and Kaveh. This article, ‎conducted in a library-based manner and descriptively-analytically, relies on the views of Laclau ‎and Mouffe, analyzing the discourses between these two figures to uncover concepts that ‎demonstrate the language used in the Shahnameh introduces Zahak as a symbol of evil and Kaveh ‎as a symbol of good. The way this linguistic opposition solidifies the positions and roles of these ‎characters, creating a myth around Kaveh as a national hero through stories that have symbolic and ‎educational functions, contributes to establishing his hegemonic discourse. Moreover, the use of ‎language to define and strengthen the collective identity of Iranians against an external enemy, ‎namely Zahak, leads to social mobilization and creates a cohesive identity around shared values.‎Keywords: discourse, Zahhak, Kaveh, Laclau and Mouffe.‎

Keywords

Main Subjects



Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 09 January 2025
  • Receive Date: 29 September 2024
  • Revise Date: 09 January 2025
  • Accept Date: 09 January 2025