The Effect of Phonological Context on Free Variation: A Case Study of Kalhori Kurdish Verbal Endings

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of English Language and Linguistics, The Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

2 M.A. Degree, Department of English and Linguistics, The Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract

In Kalhori Kurdish,, the full forms of second-person-singular and first-person-plural endings end in /ən/, but this sequence may be deleted for simplification. In certain phonetic contexts, though, the freedom of choice in these variations is lost, with only the full forms of these endings being grammatical. The present article attempts to study such phonetic contexts, and explains why and how truncation is blocked. The data were collected by interviewing 15 Kalhori Kurdish speakers from Eslamabad-e Gharb. The findings show that speakers can freely choose between the full form and truncated form except when the endings are preceded by the vowel [i], in which case, in order for the first-person-plural ending /-imən/ not to be confused with the first-person-singular /-im/, the sequence /ən/ cannot drop. Furthermore, the second-person-singular ending, although phonetically represented either as [i], [id], or [idən], cannot take the former form when preceded by the past tense suffix /i/.

Keywords

Main Subjects


References
Azadi, S. (2021). Comparison of the Verb Part in Dialect of “Feili Kurdish" and "Kalhori Kurdish" of Southern Kurdish Dialects. Journal of Iranian Regional Languages and Literature,12(2), 1-28. [In Persian]
Bamshadi, P., & Bamshadi, J. (2014). A Comparative Analysis of Inflectional Suffixes and Prefixes of the Verbs in Gurani Kurdish and Standard Persian. Language and Linguistics10(19), 101-120. [In Persian]
Bernstein, C. (1993). Measuring social causes of phonological variation in Texas. American Speech68(3), 227-240.‏
Casali, R.F. (2011). Hiatus Resolution. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology (eds M. Oostendorp, C.J. Ewen, E. Hume and K. Rice). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0061.
Dehghan, M., & Badakhshan, E. (2020). The Inflection of Verb and its Categories in Kalhori Kurdish from Bauer's Generative Morphology Perspective. Journal of Kurdish Literature5(2), 107-124. doi: 10.34785/J013.2020.697. [In Persian]
Fattahi, M. (2011). Morpho-phonological Processes in Kalhori Kurdish. Unpublished MA Thesis. Allameh Tabataba'ee University [In Persian].
Fattahi, M. (2023). The Investigation of the Progressive Prefix Relict in Kalhori Kurdish: A Comparative and Intralingual Approach. Journal of Iranian Dialects & Linguistics7(2), 113-122. [In Persian]
Gordon, E., & Deverson, T. (1985). New Zealand English: an introduction to New Zealand speech and usage. Heinemann.‏
Haspelmath, M. and Sims, A. D. (2010). Understanding Morphology. Hodder Education.
Jensen, J. T. (2004). Principles of Generative Phonology: an Introduction. John Benjamins B.V.
Kager, René. Optimality Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Laferriere, M. (1979). Ethnicity in Phonological Variation and Change. Language55(3), 603–617. https://doi.org/10.2307/413319
Meyerhoff, Miriam (2011). Introducing Sociolinguistics (2 ed.). Routledge. p. 12
Modarresi, Y (2021). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]
Mompean, J. A. (2008). Phonological free variation in English: an empirical study. In ExLing (pp. 169-172).‏
Shaghaghi, V. (2014). An Introduction to Morphology. Tehran: Samt. (In Persian)
Taheri-Ardali,M., Anonby, E., & et al., (2021). The Online Atlas of the Languages of Iran: Design, Methodology and Initial Results. Language Related Research, 12(2), 231-291.
              doi: 10.29252/LRR.12.2.8
Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. University of Texas Press.‏