A Semiotic Study of Story in Terms of the Concepts of Readerly and Writerly in Roland Barth’s Theory: A Case Study of Jamalzadeh's "Persian is Sugar" and Hedayat's "S.G.L.L"

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of English and Linguistics, Faculty of Language and Literature, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.

2 Department of Eglish Language and Literature, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Although conducting researches in the area of the categorization of literary works into open and closed texts has largely attracted the attention of the literary scholars, the analysis of the texts according to Roland Barthes’s Readerly and Writerly texts has been less popular. In this sense, “Persian is Sugar” from the collection Once upon a Time and Hedayat’s “S.G.L.L” from the collection Light-Dark have been chosen for presenting a comparative study. The research attempts to examine the concepts of readerly and writerly texts in both short stories. The central objective here, is to investigate the readerly aspects of “Persian is Sugar” and examine the notion of writerly text in “S.G.L.L.” Regarding the proposed intention, with a textual analysis, the mentioned texts will be scrutinized through Barthes’s five semiotic codes. The chosen texts will be analyzed separately and the conclusion is strictly relevant only to the stories and not the authors.

Keywords


References
Allen, G. (2003). Roland Barthes. London & New York: Routledge.
Barthes, R. (1970). S/Z. Translated by Sepideh Shokripoor (2015), Tehran: Afraz publication. [In Persian]
Booth, W. (1979). Critical Understanding. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
Culler, J. (1983). Barthes. Translated by Hossein Sheikholeslami (2011). Tehran: Ofoq Publication. [In Persian]
Dupré, L. (1993). Passage to Modernity: An Essay in the Hermeneutics of Nature and Culture. Massachusetts: Yale University Press.
Gholami, M. (2007). “The Style of Jamalzadeh.” Literary Fiction. 108, 116-125. [In Persian]
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Malden: Stanford University Press.
Hall, S. & Bram G. (editors). (1993). Formations of Modernity: Understanding Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hedayat, S. (1933). “S.G.L.L.” in Light-Dark. Tehran: Sina Publication. [In Persian]
Iranzadeh, N., & Dadkhah Tehrani, M. (2016). “On the Notion of Literary Democracy in Jamlzadeh’s Forward to Yeki Bud Yeki Nabud.” Literary Criticism. 9(33), 109-128. [In Persian]
Jamalzadeh, M. A. (1921). “Persian is Sugar” in Once upon a Time. Tehran: Parvin Electronic Publications (2009). pp 2-7. [In Persian]
Meghdadi, B. (2018). An Encyclopedia of Literary Criticism: From Plato Until Today. Tehran: Cheshmeh Publication. [In Persian]
Mir, M., Mojavezi, M., & Tamizi, E. (2012). “Analyzing the Narrative of Bunser Mishkan’s Death in Beyhaqi History Using Interpretive Approaches.” Shahid Beheshti Literary Research Conference. [In Persian]
Mizban, Javad, Taghavi, Mohammad, and Mahdavi, Mohammad Javad (2017). “Application Forms and Functions of Proverbs in the Collection of Short Stories Yeki Bood -Yeki Nabood of Jamalzadeh.” Culture and Folk Literature. Vol. 5, no. 12. pp 197-220. (In Persian)
Moshtaghmehr, R., & Karimi Gharababa, S. (2008). “Narratology of Mohammad Ali Jamalzadeh’s Short Stories.” Persian Language and Literature. Vol. 51, no. 207. pp 135-161. [In Persian]
Lodge, D., & Nigel W. (2000). Modern Criticism and Theory. 2nd Ed., New York: Longman.
Peck, J., & Martin, C. (2002). Literary Terms and Criticism. 3rd Ed., London: Palgrave.
Sharifian, M., & Rahmani, K. (2010). “Criticism of Sadegh Hedayat Stories.” Bostan Adab. 3, 143-178. [In Persian]
Taheri, Q., & Esmaily Nia, F. (2013). “Reflection of Absurdist Effects on the Works by Sadeq Hedayat.” Literary Text Research. 17(56), 85-106. [In Persian]