A Corpus-based Study of the Concept of ʔehteram ("respect") in the Iranian Culture

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Letters and Foreign Languages, Arak University, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Letters and Foreign Languages, Arak University, Iran

Abstract

In this paper attempt is made to shed light on the conceptualization of ehterām (‘respect’, ‘deference’) as a cultural keyword in a corpus of written Persian, using ethnography of communication. 717 tokens of the uses of ehterām and its cognates mohtaram (respected), mohtaramāneh (‘respectably’, ‘respectfully’), and hormat (roughly ‘reverence’) were extracted from the Persian Linguistic Data-base corpus and were semantically and pragmatically analyzed in their respective contexts. Findings indicate that ehterām and its cognates are primarily employed in relation to the 9 contexts of power, manners, qualifications, subjugation and submission, age, hospitality, caring, wealth and beauty. Drawing on research on social stratification, it is argued that the concept that unites all these contexts and concepts is sha’n or social status, in the sense of a person’s position in the social hierarchy. Furthermore, it is suggested that the concept of hormat is less dependent on the situational context and is a form of respect that is paid primarily to the position occupied by an individual according to the culturally defined system of values. Hormat is a special form of ehterām in the Iranian culture based on the culturally defined intrinsic or absolute status of categories and individuals.

Keywords: ethnography of communication, corpus-based pragmatics, respect, deference, social status, Persian culture

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

فهرست منابع

بردبار، مریم؛ گلفام، ارسلان؛ بهرامی، سحر؛ عامری، حیات (1398). روراستی تعارف‌‌‌ها و جنسیت در زبان فارسی: رویکردی شناختی. پژوهش‌های زبانی، 10(1)،21-37.
جهانگیری، نادر (1378). زبان: بازتاب زمان، فرهنگ و اندیشه (مجموعه مقالات). تهران: آگاه.
حسینی، سیدمحمد؛ آقاگلزاده، فردوس؛ کرد زعفرانلو کامبوزیا، عالیه؛ گلفام، ارسلان (1396الف). وجهه در فرهنگ ایرانی: بررسی قوم‌نگارانه مفهوم آبرو. زبانشناسی و گویش‌های خراسان، 17، 121-152.
حسینی، سیدمحمد؛ آقاگلزاده، فردوس؛ کرد زعفرانلو کامبوزیا، عالیه؛ گلفام، ارسلان (1396ب). «» و «» دو روی مفهوم وجهه در فرهنگ ایرانی: پژوهشی قوم‌نگارانه در کاربردشناسی زبان. جستارهای زبانی، 8(41)، 215-246.
حسینی، سیدمحمد (1401). دیالکتیک «صمیمیت» و «احترام» در یک گفت‌وگوی تلویزیونی. پژوهش‌های زبان‌شناسی، 14(2), 131-152.
شیخ‌الاسلام، طاهره (1395). در اسارت فرهنگ. تهران: صمدیه.
عاصی، مصطفی (1396). پایگاه دادگان زبان فارسی. برگرفته از: http://pldb.ihcs.ac.ir
Arundale, R. B. (2020). Communicating & Relating: Constituting Face in Everyday Interacting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beeman, W.O. (1976). Status, style, and strategy in Iranian interaction. Anthropological Linguistics, 18, 305-322.
Beeman, W.O. (1986). Language, Status, and Power in Iran. Indiana University Press.
Cansler, D.C. & Stiles, W.B. (1981). Relative status and interpersonal presumptuousness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17: 459-471.
Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive Interactionism. SAGE Publications.
Diamond, Julie. 1996. Status and Power in Verbal Interaction: Study of discourse in a close knit social network. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goodenough, W.H. (1965). Rethinking 'Status' and 'Role'. Toward a General Model of the Cultural Organization of Social Relationships. In M. Banton (Ed.), The Relevance of Models for Social Anthropology. Association of Social Anthropology Monographs I, (1-24). Tavistock.  
Haller, A.O. (2000). Social stratification. In Edgar F. Borgatta & Rhonda J. V. Montgomery (Eds.) Encyclopaedia of Sociology. Vol. 4, pp. 2864-2874. New York: Macmillan.
Haller, A.O., Edward L. Fink & Laura Janusik. (2000). Social psychology of status allocation. In Edgar F Borgatta & Rhonda J V Montgomery (Eds.) Encyclopaedia of Sociology. Vol. 4, pp. 2780-2789. New York: Macmillan.
Haugh, M. (2018). Corpus-based metapragmatics. In A.H. Jucker, K.P. Schneider, & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Methods in Pragmatics, 619-643. Amsterdam: Mouton De Gruyter.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (3rd Edition). USA: McGraw-Hill.
Hosseini, S. M. (2022). Self, Face, and Identity in the Iranian Culture: A Study on Three Lexemes. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 53-68.
Hubler, A., & Busse, U. (2012). Investigations into the Meta-Communicative Lexicon of English. A Contribution of Historical Pragmatics. John Benjamins.
Izadi, A. (2015). Persian honorifics and im/politeness as social practice. Journal of Pragmatics. 85, 81-91.
Izadi, A. (2017). Culture-generality and culture-specificity of face: Insights from Argumentative talk in Iranian dissertation defenses. Pragmatics and Society. 8(2), 208-230.
Jucker, A.H. (2013). Corpus Pragmatics. In: J.O. Ostman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics 2013 Installment (1-18). John Benjamins.  
Koutlaki, S. (2002). Offers and expression of thanks as face enhancements: tae'arof in Persian. Journal of Pragmatics 34(12), 1733-1756.
Koutlaki, S. (2009). Two sides of the same coin: how the notion of 'face' is encoded in Persian communication. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini & M. Haugh (Eds.), Face, Communication and Social Interaction (pp. 115-133). London: Equinox.
Persian Linguistic Database. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.Pldb.ihcs.ac.ir
Ponterotto, J. G. (2006). Brief Note on the origins, evolution, and meaning of the qualitative research concept thick description. The Qualitative Report, 11(3): 538-549.
Sahragard, R. (2003). A cultural script analysis of politeness features in Persian. In Proceeding of the 8th Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, (pp. 399-423). Japan.
Schwandt, T. A. (2001). Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Sharifian, F. (2008). Conceptualizations of del ‘heart- stomach’ in Persian. In F. Sharifian, R. Dirven, N. Yu and S. Niemeier (Eds.), Culture, Body, and Language: Conceptualizations of Internal Body Organs across Cultures and Languages, (pp.247-266). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Sharifian, F. (2017). Cultural Linguistics. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Wardhaugh, R. & Fuller, J. (2021). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (8th edition). Wiley Blackwell.
Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding Cultures Through Their Key Words. New York: Oxford University Press.
Linguistic Studies: Theory and Practice
Volume 2, Issue 1 - Serial Number 3
Fall 2023
December 2023
Pages 65-84

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 15 November 2023
  • Revise Date: 05 December 2023
  • Accept Date: 17 December 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics